Archived Initiatives

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUponDigg thisEmail this to someone

Richmond Public Schools Language Access
As the result of a complaint filed by the Legal Aid Justice Center with the U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights, the Richmond Public School division has agreed to revise and improve its policies to ensure that parents and guardians whose primary language is not English are not discriminated against and have full access to the educational process

Inappropriate Use of Restraint and Seclusion of Students with Disabilities at Virginia Schools

Following a comprehensive investigation at two public special education schools, the U.S. Department of Education has found that the repeated use of physical restraint and seclusion to manage student behavior is ineffective and inappropriate. The Department’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) determined that the PACE East and PACE West schools in Prince William County, Va., routinely denied students their right to an appropriate education when they were consistently removed from classrooms and placed in a separate room

DACA Students Win In-State Tuition
Seven courageous immigrant students represented by Legal Aid Justice Center have won their effort to gain in-state tuition eligibility—not just for themselves, but for thousands of Virginia recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring announced on April 29th, 2014 that DACA recipients are eligible to apply for in-state tuition under existing Virginia law, as the students had argued in a lawsuit filed by the Legal Aid Justice Center last year. Legal Aid Justice Center thanks Attorney General Herring for opening the doors of educational opportunity to these deserving Virginia students.

CRHA Utilities Class Action Settlement
Public housing tenants and the Charlottesville Redevelopment and Housing Authority (CRHA) reached a historic settlement in the federal class action suit filed in 2013 to challenge the failure of the CRHA to provide adequate electric utility allowances to residents. CRHA’s failure resulted in tens of thousands of dollars of overcharges to low-income Charlottesville residents.

Zombie Debt Defense 
“Zombie debt” refers to debt that third-party debt collection companies’ attempts to collect despite either it being barred by statute of limitations or the companies lack proof that they have a legal right to collect on it. These companies have made a business decision to buy from creditors only the surface of the debt and not the underlying documentation really needed to ensure (and prove) the debt is owed. In many cases, the debt is not owed.  Our goal is to use litigation to make the exploitative zombie debt collection business model too expensive to be profitable, thus forcing the debt collection companies to abandon their practice of suing low-income people without evidence to prove to the debt is actually owed.

Scott v. Clarke: Fluvanna Health Services Case
On July 24, 2012, the Legal Aid Justice Center, Wiley Rein LLP of Washington, D.C., and the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of five women prisoners incarcerated in the Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women. The lawsuit, titled Scott v. Clarke, and filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, challenges the Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) and the Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., for failing to provide constitutionally adequate medical care.  UPDATE:  We have an agreement in principal on a settlement.  Details here!

Fair Housing Lawsuit v City of Richmond
After over a year of trying to cooperate with the City, a group of thirty-two current and former mobile home park residents filed a fair housing lawsuit against the City of Richmond in Federal Court on August 18th, 2015.   The suit alleges that the City’s code enforcement campaign against mobile home parks, which began in early 2014, has violated the civil rights of residents.  According to the lawsuit, the City has subjected residents to harsh enforcement actions including unreasonable and legally unjustified repair standards.  The lawsuit describes multiple attempts to resolve the safety concerns all of which were rejected by the City.  Read the lawsuit here.